M. Braniston
you
Ihave looked nite the Acto refered to by the Pous requested and have stuck out in pencil those Lections of the Cut which have been wholly partially repeated.
"The only question is as regards fection 33 of 3 and 4 The Cap 96. Bij 7 and 8 the capty
And when Rates of
the words
"
Postage have not hitherto been
Law" are
are repeated.
authorized by Laws: and 41442 the Cup 79 repeals Lection 33 of 3 and 4th Vic cap 96
The " except so much there of cordefines " letters chargeable with postage
The operative power of this tection would therefor ceppear to have gone, though the Post Office refer to
if still in force.
face. god 1300/50
it as
Marming Hotel
560
Prins him to J.P.t. ben winte
S.P.t. Wen waiting tags,
seleffatual delay in Ansarning
Mane.
Please attack recent Cores fordon about the Postel Convention between Ithany a ?k.S.a_
Sundry on a draft pointing and the for sation 1213267 sotiene Gr. Adrian, assungs upet at
in Auswing
8.14/10
delay
The conrabin In 3235 the
for of thing proposed a certain postul arrangement with the U.S.A. this was referred to S.P.O. who replied that it in no way concerned do not understand that dep. unless it was to be given different Effect to by a Postal (mention (ele 407%/%7). After reference to the 7.0., informed, Convention
Conventions; & the former
was to
to then
not the latter can the governor madt without weactually be sent home ference to P. for approval, its the Convention
was
referred to C.P.O. who said there was no objection to it (see 10228_ I was thereupon forwarded to Washington through the F.0. Jannex the Volumes containing 3235%, 407/%7 0228%. Nie the rest of th? corresp. is in my room if you wish to age it. C.W.9.18/10
3.
2
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.